Last week's poll had 18 respondents. Eleven will not, five are willing and only two would rather play tackle. Looks like nobody wants to play tackle except me and my brother. Huh. So are the Burke boys just tougher than everyone else or, not quite as smart? As I've said before there is a fine line between bad ass and dumb ass and I have definitely crossed it a few times before and I am sure that given the opportunity, I will again. Oh well. No opportunity this time. Touch it is.
So, here's a tangent. What's with all the ED commercials during football games? Do guys that watch football have some correlation with ED? I know guys that play football also watch football but I don't think I know anyone with this ailment. At least from the sideline banter, it's not apparent. Did drug companies actually do any market research or are they just trying to annoy the crap out of us? Don't you love it when your kid asks, "Dad, what's ED?" Now my daughters just giggle when they hear "if you experience a four hour erection..." From my experience and the conversations I've had, most guys have the opposite problem - crankin one up for no damn reason. How many times back in school did you take the zero because you wouldn't go to the blackboard and solve the problem? You knew the answer but the timing was bad. Or maybe you're walking around the office and your boxers happen to rub the wrong way? It happens. I created a new poll - it's market research for Pfizer. Really. So be honest. And this poll has nothing to do with the response to last week's poll. Really.
This week it's Superbowl Saturday! The game is on 2/6 @ 9 AM @ Waters. May the best team win. Like Mr. T says, "There is no 'I' in team, but there is a 'T'! Fool!!" There's also a game on Sunday with hopefully no ED commercials. "Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints?" I got $20 dat say dem Colts do. Any takers?
Tommy B
Chief Antagonizer
Mr. T's Fan Club
P.S. So has anyone bought the new iPad?
2 comments:
From my analysis, the first game revealed signs of possible cases of ED, early on: Both teams moved the ball well, and got it up (the field) nicely, but couldn't close the deal, ending up in unwanted (defensive) stops in play.
There was however, no evidence of the East resorting to any pills, potions, or lotions. We just methodically kept plugging away at what we do best, ball control and scoring.
I have reason to believe some sort of medication was involved in the lone highlight for the West, which Mr. T forgot, on 1st or second down deep in their own territory, Bard completed a pass at (or is it "to"?) Tim D (? - whoever wore the Texas Jersey), which was nearly picked off by the normally reliable defender (yours truly). I went for the INT, but the Cialis was too strong in Bard's delivery, and what easily could have been a routine pass defensed, turned into massive gain, and pleasure for the West, as that one play put them in position to score for the only time all game.
If only that scoring surge for the West would have lasted for a couple more hours, the final score may have been closer. LOL
A big thanks, too, to the West for being so helpful in locating the yard markers and goal line in the snow. It helped us know our position on the field and was a great visual aid.
Wish we could have returned the favor of clearing the goal line as a sign of "compassion," but we never really had to. Oh well, there's always Saturday @ 9 AM. ;)
This may just be the ED talking, but what about playing flag football if there are problems with knowing whether or not a person has been touched?
Post a Comment